Показаны сообщения с ярлыком science soсiety. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком science soсiety. Показать все сообщения

четверг, 18 декабря 2025 г.

Editor-in-Chief's report on the continuation of the Review Journal of Chemistry

Editor-in-Chief Alexander Kabanov reports that Reviews and Advances in Chemistry will continue its work and accept articles from Russian authors despite the sanctions. The journal's website states that although the journal is published in English, it accepts manuscripts in Russian and assists with translation and language editing.

https://t-invariant.org/2025/12/summing-up-the-year-from-the-editor-in-chief-of-the-reviews-journal-of-chemistry-reach-and-doklady-shemistry/ 

https://link.springer.com/journal/13392/

 

суббота, 14 июня 2025 г.

ScienceInsider: Israeli attack kills two of Iran’s top nuclear weapons scientists

I don't think that doing science gives moral indulgence. A researcher who does scientific work in the military field must understand that he is a target. On the other hand, authoritarian authorities may not give him a choice, as happened with Andrei Sakharov. Having created the most monstrous weapon in the world, a thermonuclear bomb, as I understand it, he spent the rest of his life atoning for his guilt, becoming a defender of human rights in the USSR and was persecuted (in the city of Gorky, now the city has returned to its old name Nizhny Novgorod) and tortured (forced feeding through a tube).

ScienceInsider/Asia/Pacific

Israeli attack kills two of Iran’s top nuclear weapons scientists

Bombing raids target uranium enrichment facility and key personnel

13 Jun 2025 4:25 PM ET By Richard Stone

Read more: https://www.science.org/content/article/israeli-attack-kills-two-iran-s-top-nuclear-weapons-scientists

вторник, 20 мая 2025 г.

Science.org: Indian police are trying to ‘read minds' of suspects, over neuroscientists' objections

 

Mind reader?

A forensic technology developed in India sifts brain recordings for clues to a suspect’s guilt or innocence. Many neuroscientists are skeptical, but it is catching on in other countries

 

One day in 2021 an Indian student in her early teens came to her family with some distressing news: At school, a man in his 20s had called her into an empty classroom and raped her at knifepoint. Later, after the student found out she was pregnant and decided to abort, she filed a statement with the police.

The man accused of the crime, Surjaram, denied everything and sought to be released on bail. To prove his innocence, he asked to undergo three forensic science tests, including one called brain electrical oscillation signature profiling (BEOS).

During the test, he would likely have sat quietly in an empty room, listening to a series of short, first-person phrases recounting the crime scene—perhaps “I called the girl into the room,” “I closed the door,” and “I pulled a knife”—while a headset recorded his brain’s electrical activity. Meanwhile, a computer monitored how his brain responded to each phrase, looking for telltale signs that he had participated in the crime. In Surjaram’s case, the results were what he hoped for: His brain signals suggested he had no experience of these events, and was therefore innocent.

 ***

read more: https://www.science.org/content/article/indian-police-are-trying-read-minds-suspects-over-neuroscientists-objections

пятница, 16 мая 2025 г.

ScienceInsider: Low-quality papers are surging by exploiting public data sets and AI

 

Low-quality papers are surging by exploiting public data sets and AI

Paper mills are also likely contributing to “false discoveries”

 

Last year, Matt Spick began to notice oddly similar papers flooding in for peer review at Scientific Reports, where he is an associate editor. He smelled a rat. The papers all drew on a publicly available U.S. data set: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which through health exams, blood tests, and interviews has collected dietary information and other health-related measurements from more than 130,000 people. “I was getting so many nearly identical papers—one a day, sometimes even two a day,” says Spick, a statistician at the University of Surrey.

What he was seeing at his one journal is part of a larger problem, Spick has discovered. In recent years, there has been a drastic surge in poor-quality papers using NHANES, possibly spearheaded by illicit moneymaking enterprises known as paper mills and facilitated by the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text, he and colleagues reported in PLOS Biology last week. The finding suggests large public health data sets are ripe for exploitation, they say.

***

read more:  https://www.science.org/content/article/low-quality-papers-are-surging-exploiting-public-data-sets-and-ai

P.S. From me: It is necessary to develop methods for analyzing scientific texts based on AI in order to automatically filter out low-quality AI-synthesized texts before peer review. The Russian Dissernet has extensive experience in analyzing low-quality and borrowed scientific texts of dissertations from Russia and the former Soviet Union. It is necessary to use their developments to combat this new phenomenon.

 

вторник, 13 мая 2025 г.

Chronicles of a Trumpastrophe 10: Many worry about retribution. But for others, speaking out is worth the risk

 

Trump’s ‘fear factor’: Scientists go silent as funding cuts escalate

Many worry about retribution. But for others, speaking out is worth the risk

 In February, shortly after U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated, Rebekah Tromble launched a program to advise scientists and journalists targeted for intimidation and harassment. But she announced it quietly, fearing the very kind of attacks the initiative was meant to counter. “We were truly concerned that trying to draw too much attention to our work would jeopardize our funding,” says the George Washington University social scientist. “It’s a bit counterintuitive for a program that is actually trying to reach and help people.”

 ***

read more:  https://www.science.org/content/article/trump-s-fear-factor-scientists-go-silent-funding-cuts-escalate

четверг, 1 мая 2025 г.

Chronicles of a Trumpastrophe 8: 100 days of American science under siege

 About this, links to 3 articles from Science below:

 1. How Trump upended science

A chaotic 100-day push to remake federal research will have lasting consequences

 

It is almost certainly the most consequential 100 days that scientists in the United States have experienced since the end of World War II.

Since taking his oath of office on 20 January, President Donald Trump has unleashed an unprecedented rapid-fire campaign to remake—some would say demolish—vast swaths of the federal government’s scientific and public health infrastructure. His administration has erased entire agencies that fund research; fired or pushed out thousands of federal workers with technical backgrounds; terminated research and training grants and contracts worth billions of dollars; and banned new government funding for activities it finds offensive, from efforts to diversify the scientific workforce to studies of the health needs of LGBTQ people. The frenetic onslaught has touched nearly every field—from archaeology to zoology, from deep-sea research to deep-space science. And it has left researchers from postdocs to lab heads feeling bewildered, worried—and angry. Many fear that in just 14 weeks, Trump has irreversibly damaged a scientific enterprise that took many decades to build, and has long made the U.S. the envy of the world.

***

read more:  https://www.science.org/content/article/100-days-that-shook-u-s-science

2. After 100 days of upheaval, what’s next for U.S. science?

Fights over research spending and pending court rulings loom large

 With a torrent of executive orders, President Donald Trump has turned U.S. science upside down in his first 100 days, and the onslaught isn’t likely to end soon. Trump shows no sign of backing off his push to shrink the federal science workforce, end programs he considers wasteful or objectionable, and bring universities to heel by canceling their government research grants and contracts. But factors outside the White House could slow or drastically accelerate these efforts in the coming months, as Congress and the courts get a chance to embrace—or push back against—Trump’s science agenda.

***

read more: https://www.science.org/content/article/after-100-days-upheaval-what-s-next-u-s-science

3. NIH under siege

After Trump’s first 100 days, agency scientists say U.S. health institutes are demoralized and have lost essential staff and funding

On a cool, sunny, mid-April day, the cheerful redbuds and other flowering trees amid the sprawling labs on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) main campus belied the pervasive gloom. Nearly 3 months into President Donald Trump’s administration, NIH in-house scientists and other workers were reeling from mass layoffs of colleagues; the removal of leaders; and limits on travel, communication, and purchasing that have shut the agency off from the outside world, hamstrung experiments, and crushed the community’s spirits.

***

read more: https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-insiders-trump-dismantling-and-destroying-everything

 

 

пятница, 25 апреля 2025 г.

Chronicles of a Trumpastrophe 7: NIH freezes funds to Harvard and four other universities, but can’t tell them

 

NIH freezes funds to Harvard and four other universities, but can’t tell them

Move follows broader White House attack on Harvard funding and stop-work orders to contractors

 After freezing all grants to Columbia University last week, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is now stopping grant and contract payments to Harvard University and four other universities that President Donald Trump’s administration believes have not done enough to combat antisemitism on their campuses. The move will both block new funding and halt payments to investigators currently working on NIH projects.

***

read more: https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-freezes-funds-harvard-and-four-other-universities-can-t-tell-them

суббота, 19 апреля 2025 г.

t-invariant: American biologist Sergei Mirkin: “People don’t believe that this is happening in the United States today”

American biologist Sergei Mirkin: “People don’t believe that this is happening in the United States today”


American universities are being stripped of government funding. Some universities have announced hiring freezes this year. Others are laying off their staff. Still others – Columbia University, for example – have been left without government grants. But beyond purely financial decisions, we are also seeing interference in the substantive work of science. Why is the Trump administration turning on scientists? T-invariant talked to Tufts University endowment professor, biologist Sergei Mirkin, who has been working in the United States for 36 years.

Sergei Mirkin was born in 1956 in Moscow. He graduated from the Faculty of Biology of Moscow State University in 1978, then entered graduate school at the Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, defended his PhD thesis in 1983 and worked there until he left for the U.S. in 1989. From 1990 to 2006 he was faculty in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics at the University of Illinois at Chicago (Professor from 2002). Since 2007, he has served as Professor and White Family Chair in Biology at Tufts University (Biology Department Chair 2013-2019). Mirkin’s research interests lie in the area of DNA structure and function: the role of genomic instability caused by repetitive DNA sequences and collisions between transcription and replication in human genetic diseases. He is a recipient of several prestigious scientific awards and honors.

The main enemy is university liberals...

https://t-invariant.org/2025/04/american-biologist-sergei-mirkin-people-don-t-believe-that-this-is-happening-in-the-united-states-today/

четверг, 3 апреля 2025 г.

science.org: International scientists rethink U.S. conference attendance

 Careers/Scientific Community


International scientists rethink U.S. conference attendance

Opposition to Trump administration and fears of customs run-ins are shifting travel plans


31 Mar 20255:10 PM ET By Katie Langin

 

 https://www.science.org/content/article/international-scientists-rethink-us-conference-attendance

пятница, 21 марта 2025 г.

science.org: We started our Ph.D.s during COVID-19. Now, we’re graduating into political chaos

 

 Five years ago, I got the email I had hoped for. “We are very pleased to offer you admission to the Neuroscience Ph.D. program,” it read, as confetti in the school’s colors rained down the screen. My parents didn’t have college degrees. I didn’t meet someone with a Ph.D. until college—and now I was going to be one, training in my first-choice program. My friend and I decided to celebrate by making some homemade mac ’n cheese, and we headed to the grocery store for milk. But there was none: The date was 13 March 2020, and COVID-19 had been declared a pandemic 2 days before. Now, I’m nearing graduation in another time of crisis—hoping to draw strength from the lessons I learned the first time around.

 read more: https://www.science.org/content/article/we-started-our-ph-d-s-during-covid-19-now-we-re-graduating-political-chaos

 

my comment:  I think that just sitting and waiting for improvement is a bad position. If there is an opportunity to find a job in a commercial company or a startup related to scientific research, then you should try to get a job there. If possible, equip your garage, as described in the article by Nature (https://www.nature.com/articles/467634a), to do home research as a hobby, or maybe for non-governmental grants, in collaboration with your university. Your own laboratory in the garage is a guarantee that your equipment and developments will not be thrown out one "fine" day. More complex research related to dangerous and licensed actions must be carried out in large scientific centers in collaboration with them.

пятница, 14 марта 2025 г.

t-invariant: “If DOGE plans go through, U.S. scientific leadership will end.” American scientist – on Musk’s health care reform

 “If DOGE plans go through, U.S. scientific leadership will end.” American scientist – on Musk’s health care reform

 

In the coming days, the US Senate is expected to confirm Jay Bhattacharya as the new director of the National Institute of Health. This decision is awaited not only by the staff of the organization and scientists of the United States. The key institution of American science has been subjected to purges and pressure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which is headed by entrepreneur and billionaire Elon Musk. Why the reforms initiated by Donald Trump’s people are reminiscent of the situation in Germany in the 1930s and how the DOGE plans threaten the development of advanced science – this was told to T-invariant on condition of anonymity by the head of one of the laboratories of the National Institute of Health.

 

суббота, 1 марта 2025 г.

Chronicles of a Trumpastrophe 2

 1. Trump Tracker. Recent: What happened to FDA’s meeting to pick the next seasonal flu vaccine?    28 Feb 2025 By Science News Staff

 https://www.science.org/content/article/science-trump-latest-news


2.  Trump credit card freeze sparks alarm at health agencies. “Cost efficiency” order could block travel, supplies for labs and patient care.  27 Feb 20256:00 PM ET By Meredith Wadman, Jocelyn Kaiser

https://www.science.org/content/article/trump-credit-card-freeze-sparks-alarm-health-agencies


суббота, 1 февраля 2025 г.

RASA-USA: Statement in Support of Professor Yulia Sineokaya

 

Statement in Support of Professor Yulia Sineokaya

We express our unconditional support for Professor Yulia Sineokaya, a member of our association, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Philosophy, and Director of the Independent Institute of Philosophy, which was recently designated an “undesirable organization” in the Russian Federation.

The work of Yulia Sineokaya and her colleagues makes a significant contribution to preserving Russian philosophical thought and humanism in a global context. Their activities are rooted in the principles of free inquiry and intellectual integrity, which are fundamental to any academic tradition.

We stand in solidarity with Yulia Sineokaya and her colleagues in their commitment to advancing knowledge and fostering dialogue, even under challenging circumstances. We are confident that their efforts will continue to inspire and resonate both within Russia and beyond its borders.

The Board of Directors
Russian-American Science Association

 

https://rasa-usa.org/en/news/statement-support-professor-sineokaya/